Plan B for Mississippi Debate from CNN.com

Posted On September 26, 2008

Filed under Uncategorized

Comments Dropped 2 responses

Below is two articles from CNN.com’s political ticker.  They are detailing the Plan B for the Mississippi Debate.  I have been watching the news constantly about this; mainly because we have put a lot of money and time in this debate and when McCain does not show tonight; many Mississippians will view this as an insult against the state of Mississippi and the South.  The South is supposed to be important to Republicans, but we are constantly put down and snubbed by everyone in Congress.  I watched WTVA & WCBI news last night and many Mississippians are taking this very seriously.  I believe this will be political suicide for McCain if he does not show.  If he doesn’t show, it will just show how Obama is FOR the American People and how he want to let them know what is going on and how he intends to fix this.  Personally, I like a “town hall” format, so this may be a blessing in disguise for McCain not to show up.

Plan B proposed for Mississippi debate

(CNN) — Whether GOP nominee John McCain intends to participate in the first presidential debate –scheduled for Friday night — is up in the air, but Democratic opponent Barack Obama said it’s still on as far as he’s concerned.

Obama will fly to the University of Mississippi in Oxford — site of the debate — on Friday, according to his campaign.

University Chancellor Robert Khayat said if McCain does not show, the format may include members of the audience to submit questions to the moderator, Jim Lehrer. Lehrer would then pose the questions to Obama. It would take on a kind of town hall format, according to Khayat.

Khayat said he will recommend that to the Debate Commission, which would make the final decision.

The debate was to focus on foreign policy and natural security, but the economic crisis is likely to be a dominant issue as well.

On Thursday, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour said he expects both candidates to attend Friday night’s debate, even though McCain has said he’ll only go if Congress reaches a deal on the bailout.

“I expect there to be a debate tomorrow night [Friday] and I look forward to it,” Barbour told reporters at the University of Mississippi.

Barbour said he had not been in direct contact with either of the candidates and he did not have any “inside information.”

Debate planners got a big surprise Wednesday when McCain called for postponing it. The university has invested millions of dollars preparing for it.

McCain said he was suspending his campaign to focus on the $700 billion bailout proposal. His campaign said he would attend the debate if Congress passes legislation by Friday morning.

McCain said Thursday that Washington needs “all hands on deck” to work on the government’s proposed bailout plan.

Obama’s campaign has argued over the past couple of days that both attending the presidential debate and working on the bailout plan can be accomplished and the event should go on.

“I think we can do both of these things at the same time. The next president is going to face multiple crises on the same day,” Robert Gibbs, Obama’s top adviser, said on CNN’s “American Morning.”

“We’ve got a presidential debate scheduled. We’ve got a stage. We’ll have an audience. My guess is we’ll have a moderator and at least one of the presidential candidates,” Gibbs said.

Khayat, appearing with Barbour on Thursday, said university officials have been in contact with both campaigns but only in regard to “what we have to do to be prepared for tomorrow night.”

Richard Howorth, the mayor of Oxford, said debate preparations are under way and organizers are staying positive.

“We think it’s going to happen. We’re not thinking about the alternative right now, so we’re still excited about it and have a really positive attitude,” Howorth said.

Howorth acknowledged, however, that they are in a “wait-and-see mode.”

 

“The plans for this forum have been under way for more than a year and a half. The CPD’s [Commission on Presidential Debates']mission is to provide a forum in which the American public has an opportunity to hear the leading candidates for the president of the United States debate the critical issues facing the nation,” he said.

“We believe the public will be well-served by having all of the debates go forward as scheduled.”

Below is more Mississippi reactions about McCain not showing up for the Ole Miss debate.  There is something majorly wrong with McCain.

 

Greene: Mississippi reaction

Posted: 06:25 PM ET


From CNN Contributor Bob Greene

ABOARD THE ELECTION EXPRESS

BATESVILLE, Mississippi– John McCain’s request to postpone tomorrow night’s presidential debate at the University of Mississippi seems to be turning into something less than a trumpets-blaring triumph for him down here.

The state of Mississippi was waiting, with great pride, to host the first debate between McCain and Barack Obama– and the people who live here seem understandably unhappy that, after months of planning, this uncertainty has been thrown at them at the last moment.

Last night and this morning we reported on conversations with Batesville residents–one of them an avid McCain-Palin supporter– who are disappointed and even angry that McCain may not show up tomorrow night. And a conversation today with two men here who have their own theories about the possible no-show provided more viewpoints on how this is going over in northern Mississippi.

“McCain saying that he thinks it’s a good idea not to come to the debate– that’s what you call running from a challenge,” said Arcaro Conner, 45, a maintenance worker. “I don’t think he wants to debate Obama– I think he’ll talk at Obama from a distance, but he won’t talk to him to his face in the same room.”

“He doesn’t want to face the music,” said Mike Diltz, 45, also a maintenance worker. “The American people want to hear from these two men. So why would you say that you might not show up?”

McCain’s stated reason is that he believes it is more important to be in Washington, working on a solution to the economic crisis, than to be in Mississippi for a campaign debate.

“Come on,” said Arcaro Conner. “That’s like a football team that says they’re not going to play because it looks like rain. It’s not the rain the football team is worried about– it’s the team they see waiting for them across the field.”

“This whole thing about having to get an economic deal worked out over the weekend,” Mike Diltz said. “That’s like the pitch for used cars– ‘You’ve got to buy this car by the weekend, or it will be gone. I just heard from a customer who liked this car, and he might be coming back, so you’d better buy it right now.’

“What’s the rush? In around 40 days, we’re going to know who the new president will be, so why are they telling us that they have to rush to a decision right now? It took them eight years to get in this mess, and now, right before the debate, McCain is saying he doesn’t want to come because they have to fix it by the end of the weekend?”

Commentators and political analysts have been saying that McCain’s proposal to postpone the debate came as a big surprise.

“No one I talked to was surprised,” Arcaro Conner said. “Everyone I called last night said they knew all along there wasn’t going to be a debate.”

Really? That sounds unlikely– his friends really weren’t surprised?

“Not at all,” Conner said. “He doesn’t want to face Obama.”

Whatever you may think of the reasoning of Arcaro Conner and Mike Diltz, the one thing that seems beyond contradiction today is that people in Mississippi, and at the University of Mississippi, have a right to be frustrated at the prospect of the diminution of their big night during the biggest presidential campaign in recent memory.

“A couple weeks ago, all that John McCain wanted was to get on the stage with Obama,” Conner said. “Remember? ‘Let’s the two of us go around the country and talk from the same stages.‘

“Well. . . here’s his chance. Is he going to show up?”

2 Responses to “ Plan B for Mississippi Debate from CNN.com ”

  1. True Debates

    The 1992 Presidential Debates with Ross Perot were not dull. His warnings have now come true. Replace John McCain with Ron Paul. Add Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney. Barack Obama must earn his victory, not win by default.

  2. Rose Richmond

    As we try to decipher the current political circus of errors, we are for the moment scheduled for the “Great Debate” in Mississippi tonight. With luck it will really happen.

    Because of the state of our economy, no doubt the debate will end up being mostly about that. However, in talking about the economy, they have to discuss foreign policy. It is because of that deteriorating situation it is even more important to know exactly what these two men think about foreign affairs and how they will handle upcoming issues. Our economy is so entangled in foreign countries, we don’t have a choice anymore on whether or not we deal with them.

    The question is HOW?

    My first question I would like to ask both Barack Obama and John McCain about foreign affairs and policy is:

    What are your thoughts and plans on continuing to send billions of dollars to other countries for any number of reasons, good and bad, when America’s economy is failing. Can we afford to still send all of this money to anyone who asks or wants it? Can we be the saviors of the entire world even if we are about to go under?

    My next question for both candidates about this subject would be:

    If we continue to make enemies abroad because of a cocky, know it all, policemen of the world attitude, what do you think that will do to benefit America? If Venezuela, Iran, Russia, China, and all of the other countries who hate us, get together what do you think will happen to America? Is is better to stand there and be defiant with other countries or to change the tone of communication and work to at least be less hostile to the point of them wanting to destroy us. Venezuela isn’t Muslim. They are just tired of our crap. Isn’t there a way to change the way the world feels about us?

    My third question I would ask Obama and McCain is:

    Why is it necessary for America to be the Policemen/Saviors of the World? Who appointed us that role? Sure human rights is important. Sure lots of issues are important. Don’t you both think Iraq was a perfect example of American Strong Arm tactics for no real reason? Wasn’t it just George Bush trying to play the hero Sheriff with his posse?
    When we run to the rescue of every single person who is out there yelling, shouldn’t we be trying to help them get better off than they were?
    Countries we have been supposedly helping for years that 30 years ago were “Developing Countries”. They are still that today. Why when we have sent a fortune in aid and money. Why have we let that abuse continue? Will you as President let it continue?

    I think the candidates need to be very honest and very real tonight…I think America is tired of games and shows. This debate is time for reality and the truth…

Respond now.